Showing posts with label organisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label organisation. Show all posts

27 October 2015

Watch your red meat and processed meat consumption

ms 277 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization, has evaluated the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat* and processed meat*, and the news is not good.

After thoroughly reviewing the accumulated scientific literature, a Working Group of 22 experts from 10 countries convened by the IARC Monographs Programme classified the consumption of red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), based on limited evidence** that the consumption of red meat causes cancer in humans and strong mechanistic evidence supporting a carcinogenic effect. This association was observed mainly for colorectal cancer, but associations were also seen for pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer. 

The IARC notes in an online Q&A that eating red meat "has not yet been established as a cause of cancer". It also shared that if the reported associations were proven to be causal (that red meat also causes cancer), then the Global Burden of Disease Project has estimated that diets high in red meat could be responsible for 50,000 cancer deaths per year worldwide. 

Processed meat was classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidence in humans that the consumption of processed meat causes colorectal cancer. 

The experts concluded that each 50g portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%. According to the most recent estimates by the Global Burden of Disease Project, an independent academic research organisation, about 34,000 cancer deaths per year worldwide are attributable to diets high in processed meat. Assuming the association of red meat and colorectal cancer is proven to be causal (that is, red meat really does cause colorectal cancer), data from the same studies suggest that the risk of colorectal cancer could increase by 17% for every 100 gram portion of red meat eaten daily.

Tobacco smoking and asbestos are also both in Group 1, but the IARC stresses that while all are classified as carcinogenic to humans, the grouping says nothing about the relative danger of each substance. The estimates for meat-related deaths, for example contrast with about IARC-provided figures of 1 million cancer deaths per year globally due to tobacco smoking, 600,000 per year due to alcohol consumption, and more than 200,000 per year due to air pollution.

“For an individual, the risk of developing colorectal cancer because of their consumption of processed meat remains small, but this risk increases with the amount of meat consumed,” says Dr Kurt Straif, Head of the IARC Monographs Programme. “In view of the large number of people who consume processed meat, the global impact on cancer incidence is of public health importance.” 

The IARC Working Group considered more than 800 studies that investigated associations of more than a dozen types of cancer with the consumption of red meat or processed meat in many countries and populations with diverse diets. The most influential evidence came from large prospective cohort studies conducted over the past 20 years. 

"These findings further support current public health recommendations to limit intake of meat,” says Dr Christopher Wild, Director of IARC. “At the same time, red meat has nutritional value. Therefore, these results are important in enabling governments and international regulatory agencies to conduct risk assessments, in order to balance the risks and benefits of eating red meat and processed meat and to provide the best possible dietary recommendations.” 

According to the IARC, cooking meat at high temperatures or with the food in direct contact with a flame or a hot surface, as in barbecuing or pan-frying, produces more of certain types of carcinogenic chemicals (such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic aromatic amines). However, the working group stopped short of making any statements about how much meat is safe, the safest ways to cook meat, or whether raw meat is better, though it did point out that there is a risk of infection from consumption of raw meat.

Interested?

A summary of the final evaluations is available online in The Lancet Oncology, and the detailed assessments will be published as Volume 114 of the IARC Monographs. 

*Red meat refers to all types of mammalian muscle meat, such as beef, veal, pork, lamb, mutton, horse, and goat. Processed meat refers to meat that has been transformed through salting, curing, fermentation, smoking, or other processes to enhance flavour or improve preservation. Most processed meats contain pork or beef, but processed meats may also contain other red meats, poultry, offal, or meat by-products such as blood. Examples of processed meat include hot dogs (frankfurters), ham, sausages, corned beef, and biltong or beef jerky as well as canned meat and meat-based preparations and sauces. 

**Limited evidence means that a positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer but that other explanations for the observations (technically termed chance, bias, or confounding) cannot be ruled out.

16 October 2015

Mobile phone use affects road safety

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has identified a "marked increase" around the world in the use of mobile phones by drivers that is becoming a growing concern for road safety.

The distraction caused by mobile phones can impair driving performance, the WHO said, listing slower reaction times (notably braking reaction time, but also reaction to traffic signals), impaired ability to keep in the correct lane, and shorter following distances as some of the dangers.

Text messaging, popular with younger drivers, also results in "considerably reduced driving performance", the WHO said.

Drivers using a mobile phone are approximately four times more likely to be involved in a crash than when a driver does not use a phone. Worse, hands-free phones are not much safer than handheld phone sets.

While there is little concrete evidence on how to reduce mobile phone use while driving, the WHO recommends that governments be proactive. Actions that can be taken include:

Adopting legislative measures,
Launching public awareness campaigns, and
Regularly collecting data on distracted driving to better understand the nature of this problem.

posted from Bloggeroid

26 November 2014

Book promises to rescue presentations from missing the point completely

With presentations commonly used today to convey important information, manage projects, and for planning, it is not surprising that a significant proportion of the work week is spent on presentations. Yet presentations often end up being a total waste of time and resources for all concerned. 


Belgian communications expert Ed Gruwez, CEO of Ogilvy Internal Communications and Founder of presentation design company To The Point at Work, says most presentations are “simply appalling: unclear, bloated and boring exercises that completely miss their objectives and lead nowhere despite the long hours of preparation.” 

Gruwez said: “It's hard to imagine our daily, professional lives without presentations. Yet money and many hours of useless work are lost in presentations that lead nowhere. There has been far too little research in this field but the little that is available indicates that presentations are not only often a waste of time but they also impact the quality of corporate decisions, and even the general employee job satisfaction. 

“Managers and organisations would therefore be well inspired to stop and think about the quality of their presentations and how to handle them better.” 

Gruwez has created a simple, effective method to get the message across. Concerned that organisations are losing “handfuls of cash and man-hours” through bad presentations, at a time when reducing expenditures has never been more important, he has penned the first step-by-step guide of its kind to getting presentations right. 

Presentation, Thinking & Design: Create better presentations, quicker – newly released by Pearson, a major education publisher, through their FT Publishing International imprint – is an easy-to-follow, pinpointed manual to mastering the content, structure and logic behind the presentation, and sharing a message with impact. It also covers the theory underpinning good practice, explaining how the human mind works in terms of receiving, processing and storing information, and how to harness it. 

Across 240 pages, this highly-visual, full-colour book reveals how to: 

  • Prepare an excellent presentation in limited time 
  • Structure ideas to make them clear for those less familiar with the subject 
  • Make a presentation as short as possible, yet still complete 
  • Make ideas attractive to an audience  
  • Get the audience to remember the key points 

Although aimed primarily at those who typically do a lot of presentations, the book is relevant to anyone interested in improving their communication skills and will help sharpen up reports, important emails and keynote speeches. 

The book costs S$45.95 inclusive of GST in Singapore, and can be purchased at major retail outlets such as MPH, Times and Times Newslink. It is also available online here.


*Image from Pearson.